Conspiracy Theories about the Women’s Prize for Fiction 2020

Hello readers!

Once you get invested in something so niche like a book prize, it’s inevitable to start using your imagination too much, especially during these times of mental idleness, which is why I’m writing this post! Yay! As a warning, I’m under the delusion that I’m funny, so I apologize for that. Last year, I talked a bit about some strange coincidences on the 2019 longlist (Rachel also wrote an excellent post about that, which went a bit deeper into the comparisons!), so clearly that is something suspicious going on every year. This year I’m bringing to you conspiracy theories!

This is obvious, but just to be sure: I am clearly joking this entire post. I don’t hate any of the books (yet!!), and have enjoyed several of them so far! I admire the WP very much and will continue to read from their recommendations for years to come 🙂 so please don’t get mad!

the mirror and the light hilary mantel

The books suck this year so the Mantel will win

Obviously. With the exception of my perfect-can-do-no-wrong baby Woman, Girl, Other. Which leads me to the next one…

Since they had no idea how Brexit would go, they made sure that a UK author would win, just in case

Theory concocted by Hannah! Since our bets are on either Evaristo or Mantel, this seems like a rather obvious conclusion. They didn’t even try to be subtle.

How We Disappeared was added to the list to roast GirlHow we disappeared by Jing-Jing Lee

Really, read both and come tell me that’s not the case. Callum wrote a brilliant review comparing them! Girl WISHES it had the power of How we Disappeared.

There has to be at least one book that is absolutely terrible and the judges only added because they thought “Well, I had to read so you gotta suffer too!”

This year’s is… huh, maybe I don’t wanna go into it. I’ll let you guess.

The judges get extra points every time they add a Greek myth/history retelling

Really, they have a bingo. “Women suffering because of motherhood” is 2 points already, “Straight romantic relationships are hard” is 1 point and an extra point for a cheating husband. “Terrible book nobody knows how it got longlisted” is 3 points! (I clearly don’t understand bingo)

ducks newburyport lucy ellmannWeather was added because the judges were too lazy to read Ducks, Newburyport

The voice of the main character in Weather is quite similar to Ducks, Newburyport, and it’s basically a tl;dr version for people who don’t want to commit to several hundred pages of stream of consciousness. So clearly this is what happened. (Read Ducks, though!!)

Or, alternatively…

They decided between the chunk Mantel or the brick that is Ducks by rolling dice

Two big really books just wouldn’t do – the judges have lives and things to do, places to go and no time to read BOTH. So they rolled a die and 1-3 the Mantel was in, 4-6 Ducks was in.

And finally…

Margaret Atwood paid the judges not to longlist The Testaments

A big sum, too. Each judge got a yacht and a lifetime supply of sparkling rosé, plus free tickets to watch Frozen 2. All of this so as not to repeat the drama that was the Booker’s.

20 thoughts on “Conspiracy Theories about the Women’s Prize for Fiction 2020

  1. YES this was so much fun to read! The Weather/Ducks theory especially seems so likely and so frustrating to me, an avid Ducks fan. It really would be interesting to get some insider intel from the judges’ discussions and see how they make some of their choices!!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yay thanks!! I hope the WP doesn’t cancel me after this, but if you see them looking defensive about Weather, you will know the truth!!! And yes, it would be SO interesting to know how they choose the longlisted books… clearly I think they need a new method.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Lmao this longlist was asking to be roasted, let’s face it. The amazing titles that didn’t make it made me really salty! And yes, how is it possible that so many Greek retellings make the list??

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Pingback: Weekly Wrap-up | April 12, 2020 – Gil Reads Books

  3. Pingback: Thoughts on the Women’s Prize for Fiction 2020 + (tbc) the Winner | Naty's Bookshelf

  4. Pingback: Final Thoughts on the Women’s Prize Squad Longlist (Book Blogger Edition) | Naty's Bookshelf

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s